Catching rays? Catch it early: Skin cancer prevention and early detection

Skin cancer is one of the most common and simultaneously one of the most preventable cancers in the United States, yet it continues to place a substantial burden on patients and the healthcare system. Rising ultraviolet (UV) exposure, aging populations, and inconsistent use of sun protection contribute to steadily increasing incidence rates.

That being said, outcomes are highly dependent on how early lesions are identified and managed – this requires active vigilance from both patients and primary care providers, combined with the appropriate use of existing and emerging skin cancer detection technologies, to achieve the best results.

In this piece, we will discuss the prevalence and impact of skin cancer, who is most at risk, and why early detection meaningfully changes outcomes and healthcare utilization. We will also outline practical prevention strategies and clinical approaches to early identification, including emerging AI-based screening strategies and the role of appropriate biopsy techniques and structured screening in at-risk populations. Finally, we will frame these strategies within a value-based care perspective focused on prevention, efficiency, the careful balance between under- and over-diagnosis, and improved long-term outcomes.

What is skin cancer?

Skin cancer refers to the abnormal growth of skin cells, most commonly caused by ultraviolet (UV) radiation–induced DNA damage. The three most common types are basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma.

BCC and SCC are collectively referred to as non-melanoma skin cancers and are highly treatable when identified early. Melanoma is less common but more aggressive and accounts for the majority of skin cancer–related deaths.

More than 5 million cases of skin cancer are treated annually in the United States, making it the most common cancer overall.¹ Despite this, it is highly preventable and often curable when detected early.

Prevention, risk, and early detection impact

Skin cancer represents a major and growing public health burden:

Importantly, stage at diagnosis is the strongest predictor of outcome. The 5-year survival rate for localized melanoma is approximately 99%, but drops significantly once regional or distant spread occurs.⁵ Early detection is therefore not only clinically important but also cost-saving.

Individuals at higher risk include:

  • Occupational UV exposure (construction, agriculture, outdoor labor)
  • Family history of melanoma or atypical nevi
  • >50 moles 
  • History of severe childhood sunburns
  • Indoor tanning exposure (especially before age 35)
  • Fair skin phenotype (light skin, eyes, freckles)
  • Geographic regions with higher UV index exposure

Clinical and systemic misconceptions

Clinical misconceptions:

  • Skin cancer is often incorrectly viewed as "low risk" because non-melanoma types are common and highly treatable; each NMSC lesion must be individually risk-stratified, as high-risk features can confer significant recurrence and metastatic potential
  • “Spot checks” performed by PCPs are often insufficient to catch melanomas; thorough skin exams should be performed and investigate covered and also hidden areas (scalp, between toes, soles of feet, etc.)
  • Delayed recognition of suspicious or evolving lesions remains a major driver of late-stage melanoma diagnosis
  • Biopsy approach matters – superficial shave biopsies may be insufficient for suspected melanoma and can affect staging accuracy

Systemic Misconceptions:

These misconceptions lead to behavior that decreases adoption of skin cancer prevention strategies or care seeking:

  • “I don’t get sunburns, so it’s unlikely I’ll get skin cancer”: Cumulative UV exposure and DNA damage, and not sunburn frequency, is the predominant risk factor
  • “A base tan protects me from skin cancer”: A tan provides at most 4-5 SPF of protection and is insufficient to protect from UV-induced DNA damage
  • “People with dark skin don’t get skin cancer”: Individuals of all skin types and pigments can develop skin cancer
  • “I work indoors, so I don’t need to worry about skin cancer”: Everyone is at risk for skin cancer; acute, intense recreational exposure (weekends, holidays, tanning beds) can be more carcinogenic than chronic occupational exposure

Not adopting effective prevention strategies, and missed or delayed diagnoses ultimately increase downstream healthcare utilization, including more extensive surgical excisions, sentinel lymph node biopsy, systemic immunotherapy, and reconstructive procedures.

Prevention and early detection strategies

Point 1: UV protection and behavioral prevention

UV exposure is the most modifiable risk factor. Recommended strategies include:

  • Daily use of broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30) with reapplication every 2 hours
  • Protective clothing, hats, and UV-blocking sunglasses
  • Avoidance of peak UV exposure hours (10 AM–2 PM)
  • Elimination of indoor tanning, which significantly increases melanoma risk

Point 2: Patient awareness and screening

Comprehensive patient education and early detection significantly improves outcomes:

  • Prompt evaluation of lesions that bleed, crust, or fail to heal
  • Annual full-body skin exams for high-risk individuals – improved nodular melanoma detection compared to ABCDE self-exams
  • Educating patients on the ABCDE framework (Asymmetry, Border, Color, Diameter, Evolution) enables monthly self-exams
    • AI-based mobile health apps for skin cancer surveillance can be a tool for potential at-home detection of new and/or suspiciously changing lesions and increase diagnoses (via PCP engagement)
    • Potential for healthcare overutilization for biopsies of non-malignant lesions

Point 3: Clinical evaluation and biopsy strategy

Primary care and dermatology providers play a critical role in thorough skin exams for the early diagnosis of suspicious lesions and follow clinically-grounded biopsy workup:

  • Shave biopsy: Superficial lesions
  • Punch biopsy: Deeper dermal sampling
  • Excisional biopsy: Preferred for suspected melanoma to ensure accurate staging

Incorrect biopsy technique can lead to under-staging and delayed definitive treatment, particularly in melanoma where depth of invasion determines prognosis and management.

Treatment strategies for confirmed skin cancer

Surgical excision is the gold standard for confirmed skin cancer, with Mohs micrographic surgery offering the lowest recurrence rates (~1.9%) and maximum tissue conservation, particularly for high-risk or cosmetically sensitive lesions.

  • Low-risk lesions: Standard excision, curettage and electrodesiccation, or topical therapies (superficial BCC)
  • High-risk lesions: Mohs surgery preferred
  • Advanced disease: Multimodality treatment including surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy

Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy (IG-SRT/GentleCure) uses ultrasound-guided superficial radiation to treat NMSC non-invasively, reporting ~99% local control in retrospective studies. 

  • Mohs surgery demonstrates significantly lower recurrence (1.9% vs 6.3%), and is recommended only as a secondary option when surgery is not feasible or is refused by the patient
  • IG-SRT can also be significantly more expensive than Mohs surgery

Skin cancer management and value-based care 

From a value-based care standpoint, skin cancer management is a high-yield area for prevention and early intervention. Early detection reduces:

  • Costly advanced surgical interventions
  • Use of systemic therapies (e.g., immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma)
  • Avoidable morbidity from late-stage disease

Emerging AI-based skin surveillance technologies (e.g., smartphone dermoscopy apps, algorithm-assisted lesion tracking) can serve as useful adjuncts for patient-guided monitoring and can support collaboration between patients, PCPs, and dermatologists by flagging concerns about changes in lesions over time. However, these tools are not diagnostic authorities: they do not replace clinical evaluation, dermoscopy by a trained provider, or histopathologic confirmation via biopsy. Their role is best understood as a triage aid that may prompt earlier clinical assessment, not as a substitute for it.

Additionally, accurate documentation and coding of high-risk lesions and precancerous conditions (e.g., actinic keratosis) supports proactive surveillance and population-level risk stratification, enabling a closed-loop referral pathway from screening through diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

Conclusion (and call to action)

Skin cancer is one of the most preventable and treatable cancers when identified early, yet it continues to impose a significant clinical and economic burden. Prevention, patient awareness, and timely clinical evaluation remain the most effective tools for improving outcomes.

At AAVBC, we emphasize that skin cancer care is a clear example of value-based medicine in action: prevention, early intervention, accurate coding, and coordinated care pathways directly improve both outcomes and system efficiency.

To learn more about preventive care strategies and chronic disease management approaches, explore additional resources in the AAVBC Knowledge Hub.

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2025. https://www.cancer.org
  2. American Academy of Dermatology Association. Skin cancer statistics. https://www.aad.org/media/stats-skin-cancer
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Melanoma of the skin statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/skin-cancer/statistics/index.html 
  4. National Cancer Institute. Melanoma of the skin—cancer stat facts. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html
  5. National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer statistics review: melanoma survival rates. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html
  6. Rigel DS. Epidemiology of melanoma. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2010;29(4):204-209.
  7. Guy GP Jr, Machlin SR, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR. Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the U.S. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):698-726.e1.
  8. Owens B. Indoor tanning and melanoma risk: evidence update. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(3):286-287.
  9. Swetter SM, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):208-250.

Medical Disclaimer

The above content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health providers with any questions about a medical condition.

Share this post
This is a success message.
This is an error message.