Testosterone replacement therapy in men

What the evidence now supports, and what to prioritize first

IN BRIEF
  • Testosterone prescribing has risen sharply — use in the U.S. more than tripled between 2001 and 2011,1,2 and the number of men treated rose another 27% between 2018 and 2022;3 telehealth has made access faster and less expensive than ever
  • The growth is concentrated in younger men. Between 2018 and 2022 the steepest increases were in the youngest patients — about 120% in men 24 and under, and 86% in men 25-34,3 compared with 12% in men 65 and older
  • The safety picture has shifted. The TRAVERSE trial found no increase in major cardiovascular events,4 and in 2025 the FDA removed the cardiovascular boxed warning while adding a new caution about blood pressure
  • Therapy is often short-lived: In U.S. data, most men — by some estimates over 80% of those on topical gels6,7 — discontinue within the first year, frequently because the underlying cause was never addressed
  • The highest-value first step is diagnostic discipline – confirm low testosterone on two morning measurements across 2 or 3 weeks, identify the cause, and treat reversible contributors before prescribing8,9
  • Much of today's demand tracks broader health trends such as obesity, poor sleep, and metabolic disease. The highest-value first move is usually treating reversible causes and reserving therapy for confirmed, symptomatic deficiency

Rising use, and easier access

Over the past decade, the clinical conversation about testosterone has shifted. Past concerns centered on cardiovascular risk; today the more pressing question is how readily the therapy can be obtained. Prescriptions are inexpensive, the safety evidence has become more reassuring, and a prescription can now be issued through a brief telehealth encounter.

The trend is evident in the data. U.S. testosterone use more than tripled between 2001 and 2011,1,2 and the number of men receiving treatment rose another 27% between 2018 and 2022.3 Generic injectable formulations cost only a few dollars per dose, and telehealth platforms have replaced what was once a urology referral with a short online intake.10

FIGURE 1: The growth is concentrated in younger men. Relative change in U.S. men treated with testosterone by age group, 2018-22. Source: Selinger & Thallapureddy, PLoS One 2024

The increase is concentrated among younger men rather than the older patients in whom deficiency is most expected. The steepest relative rises were in the youngest groups, about 120% in men 24 and under and 86% in men 25–34,3 while the largest absolute increases were among men aged 35–54. Many of these patients present with non-specific goals such as improved energy, body composition, or general well-being rather than a confirmed deficiency.

This rise is not without clinical basis. Low testosterone is relatively common, largely because its principal drivers are common: In survey data roughly 1 in 4 adult men have a low level on testing, though far fewer, 1 in 20, have both a low level and the symptoms needed for a diagnosis.11 Prevalence increases with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and poor sleep.

The distinction that matters is between a low number and a confirmed diagnosis, and that is where the clinical work begins.

What Counts as Low Testosterone? 

It is a clinical diagnosis, not a single lab value. Three elements have to line up: 

What this means for the evaluation

Low testosterone is a clinical diagnosis rather than a single laboratory value, and that distinction is easily lost in expedited prescribing. Three elements must align – compatible symptoms, a total testosterone level consistently below approximately 300 ng/dL, and confirmation on at least two early-morning measurements preferably 2–3 weeks apart, since levels vary across the day and a single afternoon sample can mislead.8,9

A low result marks the beginning of the evaluation, not its conclusion. The more useful question is why the testosterone level is low. Obesity, untreated obstructive sleep apnea, alcohol use, opioids, type 2 diabetes, and thyroid disease can all suppress testosterone, and several are reversible. The symptoms that most often prompt testing, fatigue and low motivation, are also the least specific, and frequently reflect sleep loss, depression, or cardiometabolic illness rather than a primary hormonal deficit. Omitting this step risks committing a patient to long-term therapy for a condition that weight loss or treatment of sleep apnea might have resolved.

What the TRAVERSE trial established

For roughly a decade, cardiovascular concern shaped prescribing. It originated in early observational studies later shown to have methodological limitations, but the resulting boxed warning persisted and discouraged many clinicians.

The TRAVERSE trial addressed much of this uncertainty. It followed 5,246 men with hypogonadism and established or high cardiovascular risk, with a mean treatment duration of about 22 months, and found testosterone non-inferior to placebo for major adverse cardiovascular events.4 On the basis of these results, the FDA removed the cardiovascular boxed warning in 2025.5


BENEFITS AND RISK

Where risk actually comes from

These findings are best read with care rather than as a blanket reassurance. The same trial reported higher rates of atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, and acute kidney injury in the testosterone group, and the FDA paired the warning’s removal with a new caution regarding increases in blood pressure.4,5 The reasonable interpretation is that testosterone does not appear to raise the risk of major cardiac events, but it is not without risk and warrants ongoing monitoring.

The benefits of testosterone therapy are meaningful but should not be oversold. Across randomized trials, it most consistently improves sexual desire, sexual activity, and erectile function, can improve some depressive symptoms, and can correct anemia and improve lean mass and bone density in hypogonadal men.12,13 The data is much weaker for broad “anti-aging” claims about vitality, cognition, or glycemic control, and the 2024 fracture analysis found no fracture benefit, with numerically more fractures in the testosterone group than placebo.14

FIGURE 2: Strength of evidence by outcome. Bar length is an illustrative rating of evidence consistency, not an effect size. Sources: Snyder et al. 2016 (ref 12); Diem et al. 2020 (ref 13); Snyder et al. 2024 (ref 14)

Beyond cardiovascular considerations, several risks merit explicit discussion before therapy begins. The most consequential for younger men is the effect on fertility – exogenous testosterone suppresses and disrupts endogenous production, and most men reach azoospermia or severe oligospermia within three to six months.15 For a patient who hopes to conceive, this is a central consideration, and guidelines advise against initiating testosterone in men who desire fertility within the coming year.8,9

Testosterone also raises hematocrit and can precipitate erythrocytosis; hematocrit is monitored during treatment.8,9 The benefits, while real, are narrower than often portrayed: the evidence is strongest for sexual desire and erectile function, modest for anemia and bone density, and weak or inconsistent for the broader claims of improved mood, energy, cognition, or metabolic control that feature prominently in direct-to-consumer marketing.8,13 The 2024 TRAVERSE fracture analysis found not an absence of benefit but a higher fracture rate in the testosterone group.14 Patients are best served by a clear account of what the therapy can, and cannot, be expected to achieve.


HIGHEST-VALUE FIRST MOVE

Treating the root cause first

Many men seeking testosterone replacement therapy do not have irreversible gonadal failure. They have functional hypogonadism tied to obesity, type 2 diabetes, poor sleep, chronic stress, alcohol excess, opioids, glucocorticoids, or untreated sleep apnea.16 Obesity is one of the strongest drivers of low testosterone, and substantial weight loss can raise levels and sometimes reverse obesity-related secondary hypogonadism. Sleep pattern and quality are important considerations: even one week of restricted sleep measurably lowers testosterone in healthy young men.17,18

That is why a conservative approach is not dismissive medicine — it is often the highest-value medicine. Before replacing testosterone, many men benefit from improving sleep, screening for sleep apnea, reducing excess adiposity, addressing alcohol and medication contributors, and adding regular physical activity, especially resistance training. Lifestyle change is the only intervention that can improve testosterone while also improving blood pressure, body composition, and long-term cardiometabolic health.

PUTTING IT INTO PRACTICE

Who to consider, and how to start

The best primary care candidate is the man with persistent symptoms, two clearly low morning testosterone levels, and an evaluation that supports true hypogonadism rather than a missed reversible driver.8,9 Shared decision-making, not patient demand or boutique branding, should drive the prescription.

Several groups are poor candidates until their underlying issues are addressed:

When replacement is appropriate, value-based prescribing means choosing the route that fits the patient’s diagnosis, adherence, monitoring needs, household situation, and cost. For many U.S. patients, generic short-acting injectable testosterone cypionate or enanthate is the most economical and commonly covered option, and subcutaneous self-injection is a safe, practical alternative to intramuscular dosing.21 In practical primary care, a generic injectable or a gel is usually the most defensible first-line start.22

First-line: a generic injectable or a gel is usually the most defensible start. Sources: Figueiredo et al. 2022 (ref 21); Heidelbaugh 2024 (ref 22)

Regulation is moving toward more nuance, not broader prescribing. Alongside the 2025 labeling changes, the FDA in 2026 signaled openness to a possible future indication for low libido in men with idiopathic hypogonadism — an evolving discussion, not a new standard that justifies treating vague aging symptoms.5,23 The goal is not supraphysiologic “optimization.” It is symptom relief with physiologic replacement, ongoing monitoring, and periodic reassessment of whether the therapy is still helping enough to justify its risk and cost.

References

  1. Baillargeon J, Urban RJ, Ottenbacher KJ, et al. Trends in androgen prescribing in the United States, 2001 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(15):1465-1466.
  2. Baillargeon J, Kuo YF, Westra JR, et al. Testosterone prescribing in the United States, 2002–2016. JAMA. 2018;320(2):200-202.
  3. Selinger S, Thallapureddy A. Cross-sectional analysis of national testosterone prescribing through prescription drug monitoring programs, 2018–2022. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0309160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309160
  4. Lincoff AM, Bhasin S, Flevaris P, et al. Cardiovascular safety of testosterone-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(2):107-117.
  5. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA issues class-wide labeling changes for testosterone products. February 28, 2025. fda.gov
  6. Donatucci C, Cui Z, Fang Y, Muram D. Long-term treatment patterns of testosterone replacement medications. Sex Med. 2016;4(2):e64-e71.
  7. Martins D, Yao Z, Tadrous M, et al. The appropriateness and persistence of testosterone replacement therapy in Ontario. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(2):119-126. doi:10.1002/pds.4083
  8. Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(5):1715-1744.
  9. Mulhall JP, Trost LW, Brannigan RE, et al. Evaluation and management of testosterone deficiency: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200(2):423-432.
  10. Nguyen N, Sun T, Punjani N, et al. Characteristics of men who use direct-to-consumer men’s health telemedicine services. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35(7):635-639.
  11. Araujo AB, Esche GR, Kupelian V, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic androgen deficiency in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(11):4241-4247. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1245
  12. Snyder PJ, Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, et al. Effects of testosterone treatment in older men. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):611-624.
  13. Diem SJ, Greer NL, MacDonald R, et al. Efficacy and safety of testosterone treatment in men: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline by the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(2):105-118. doi:10.7326/M19-0830
  14. Snyder PJ, Bauer DC, Ellenberg SS, et al. Testosterone treatment and fractures in men with hypogonadism. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(3):203-211.
  15. Naelitz BD, Momtazi-Mar L, Vallabhaneni S, et al. Testosterone replacement therapy and spermatogenesis in reproductive age men. Nat Rev Urol. Published online May 9, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41585-025-01032-8
  16. De Silva NL, Papanikolaou N, Grossmann M, et al. Male hypogonadism: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12(10):761-774.
  17. Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Effect of 1 week of sleep restriction on testosterone levels in young healthy men. JAMA. 2011;305(21):2173-2174.
  18. Su L, Zhang SZ, Zhu J, Wu J, Jiao YZ. Effect of partial and total sleep deprivation on serum testosterone in healthy males: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2021;88:267-273. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2021.10.031
  19. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. 2018. cdc.gov
  20. Bhasin S, Travison TG, Pencina KM, et al. Prostate safety events during testosterone replacement therapy in men with hypogonadism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2348692.
  21. Figueiredo MG, Gagliano-Juca T, Basaria S. Testosterone therapy with subcutaneous injections: a safe, practical, and reasonable option. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(3):614-626.
  22. Heidelbaugh JJ. Testosterone replacement therapy for male hypogonadism. Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(6):543-549.
  23. US Food and Drug Administration. Potential new indication for testosterone replacement therapy. Fed Regist. April 20, 2026. federalregister.gov
  24. Bandari J, Ayyash OM, Emery SL, et al. Marketing and testosterone treatment in the USA: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(4-5):395-402.

Medical Disclaimer

The above content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health providers with any questions about a medical condition.

Share this post
This is a success message.
This is an error message.